What action can the board take that is less severe than suspension or revocation?

The choice of requiring additional training is considered less severe than suspension or revocation because it serves as a corrective measure rather than a punitive one. When a board identifies an issue with a pharmacist's or pharmacy's practice that may be due to a lack of knowledge or a skills deficiency, mandating additional training allows the individual to improve their competencies and prevent future violations.

This corrective action aims to reinforce the individual's professional development rather than removing their ability to practice or significantly limiting their scope of practice. In contrast, immediate suspension, a letter of reprimand, or permanent restrictions on practice carry more severe implications. Immediate suspension removes the individual's license temporarily, a letter of reprimand serves as a formal notice of wrongdoing that can impact one's professional record, and permanent restrictions can greatly hinder a pharmacist's ability to operate in their field. Thus, requiring additional training is a less severe, more rehabilitative response.