Which of the following is NOT a ground for discipline of pharmacists?

Being late on a report does not establish a clear basis for disciplinary action against a pharmacist. Regulatory bodies primarily focus on actions that compromise patient safety, ethical conduct, or the integrity of the profession. For a matter to be deemed serious enough for disciplinary measures, it usually must reflect a violation of legal standards or professional conduct requirements. Late submissions, while potentially an administrative concern, generally do not rise to the level of misconduct that would warrant disciplinary proceedings.

In contrast, refusal to allow the board to inspect, being found guilty of a felony, and practicing with an inactive license are all significant violations that directly affect the legal and ethical standards necessary for pharmacists. These actions can potentially harm patients or undermine the regulatory framework within which pharmacists operate, thus justifying disciplinary actions.